He Used Remote Viewing to Predict the Lottery — Twice (with Sean McNamara)

Timothy Schultz:

lottery twice in: 2019

Sean McNamara:

I'm alright, Tim. Thanks for having me on. I'm excited to chat with you.

Timothy Schultz:

Yeah, thank you so much for taking the time. I really appreciate it. For people that are not yet familiar with your work or what you do, how would you describe that?

Sean McNamara:

I guess the easiest way to put it is I'm a psychic trainer. I help people explore consciousness in various ways through different psychic abilities. And I've been doing that for quite a few years now. And it's just a lot of fun. It's a way to help people experience their intrinsic abilities. So I don't give anyone any powers. They just have techniques to bring out what's already inside of them. And that usually builds confidence and a sense of wonder in their life.

Timothy Schultz:

Have you always known that you were psychic? Did that start from childhood or?

Sean McNamara:

I didn't think about it too much growing up. It was something that occurred just at the end of my spiritual, my formal spiritual search. So I grew up as a Catholic, but I was not satisfied with a belief based system, being told what to believe. But I was concerned about the afterlife because as a child I had appendicitis. This was when I was about 7 years old and realized my mortality at that point because I almost died. And And that's where I had developed the problem with being told what to believe, especially about the afterlife. I wasn't satisfied. So I started studying other traditions and other religions and found that even though some, like Buddhism, claim to not be faith-based but experience-based, there is always some element of belief there. And I wasn't satisfied. I really wanted to find some experience that would show me that we are more than our physical bodies. That something in me would endure after my death. And no religion was able to really give me a satisfying answer. So what I did was start reading books about how to have an out-of-body experience. And some of them had really great instructions and I just trained myself every day for months. And finally had my first out- of-body experience and then several in a couple years after that. But that very first one freed me from my fear of death. And some people might not think that the out-of-body experience is necessarily a psychic phenomena, but I think it is an experience of consciousness beyond the physical body. And of course, any psychic phenomena could be regarded that way, an experience beyond the physical, of obtaining information from who knows where, but not from our physical eyes and not from our physical ears, but from some other channel of information. So after spending a lot of time dedicating myself to training in the out of body experience, I started exploring other psychic abilities. And the next one I really focused on was telekinesis, also known as psychokinesis or mind over matter. And I spent a long time on that, learning how to move a very small object, a little piece of tin foil covered in a glass dome, moving that with my intention and attention. And then I started learning about remote viewing and spent quite a bit of time learning that and then teaching it to others. And then currently, I'm focused mostly on telepathy, but I find that at the root, these are all basically the same thing, the experience of consciousness in a non-physical way. But it was the remote viewing that really got me more involved with how to apply this towards lottery. So I'll stop there in case you wanna ask me something before I go into that.

Timothy Schultz:

Yeah, I have a million questions for you, and this is all so interesting. A lot of people watching and listening today are interested in the lottery, which I do want to ask you about in just a moment. But you mentioned that you almost died at age seven. What happened with that?

Sean McNamara:

I had waited too long. I hadn't complained enough to my parents that I was in so much pain that when I finally got taken to the hospital and they did the surgery, like my appendix burst as they were pulling it out of my body. And it wasn't like I was gonna die instantly, but if it bursts while it's in you, it causes really bad infection. And if you don't get that treated right away. So I was told this as a child, like, wow, you're lucky that we got to you when we did, otherwise you'd be dead. Which is a pretty strong thing for a seven-year-old to hear, and that's, you know, so it was in the back of my mind growing up, this thing about, yeah, I'm going to die someday. I almost died once, I could almost die again, and I started asking the bigger questions about life and about reality because of that incident.

Timothy Schultz:

win in: 2019

Sean McNamara:

Yeah, so I've had this group of friends here in Denver that we get together every once in a while and just have fun with psychic abilities. And it's really great working with the same group of friends year after year, because we get to know each other, we're really comfortable with each other. We trust each other and they're willing to try these crazy experiments with me. And I had tried to use remote viewing for the lottery in the past. For one of the big lotteries, which requires getting all six numbers, right? And that's a really big challenge. But I thought, why don't we try something more manageable, the Pick 3. So for those who are not familiar with the Pick 3 lottery, it's pick the right three numbers between 0 and 9, and then you win the jackpot. And it's a small jackpot, right, because almost by chance you could pick the right three numbers. So it's like an $80 jackpot so it's not huge. But that's not why we were using the Pick 3. Of course, we weren't in it for the money. It was just a good training exercise that can we predict the future accurately enough? Can we predict the right three numbers out of 10 that would be drawn at the drawing time? And can we use something called associative remote viewing to predict the feature? So a lot of people who are familiar with associative remote viewing know that it can be used to predict the stock market, it can be used to predict the outcome of football games, actually any sporting event. If there's gonna be a winner and a loser, or if with the stock market, it's up or down that you're trying to predict, you can predict that with associitive remote viewing. With the Pick 3, it's more complicated because we're trying pick three numbers that are drawn. And that also means we have to predict seven numbers that will not be drawn. So it's more complex. It's not so simple. I should explain what remote viewing is and what associative remote viewing is before I go further though. So at its root, remote viewing is clairvoyance with a protocol. So it not just sitting back and I'm gonna look at, see a number, what number comes to me? Oh. You know, or what numbers are not going to be drawn? I'm just going to wait and see if a number shows up. It's not that kind of clairvoyance. The protocol with remote viewing is that there's a target that you're trying to perceive, but you don't know anything about the target. Someone gives you, let's say six digits, a coordinate that's assigned. It represents the target you're trying to perceive. And they just give you these numbers and you focus on the numbers and you set your intention to perceive information about the targets. Remember, you don't know anything about the target. All you have are these six numbers. But then by setting your intention, relaxing, and being open to information coming in, then you write it down, and that's important. Writing or recording your impressions, either on paper or being interviewed by someone or recording it, and then at a certain point in the future, you are showing the target that you're trying to perceive, and that is called getting your feedback. And that's important for training. You can see were my psychic impressions accurate compared to the feedback? Is there any information here that matches up with the target? And the target with regular remote viewing could be something, could be a place, a person, an event from the past, but the feedback has to be real and accurate, like a photograph or a video or something. There has to something for you to compare your impressions to so that you know you did a good job and then you can learn from it. So you hear especially on social media people doing remote viewing to see what's going on at some other galaxy and that maybe human satellites haven't even gotten there yet and someone's getting impressions about what's happening at that galaxy. Well they'll never be feedback in their lifetime to see if they were right or wrong. So they're saying, oh I see a planet there and there's creatures and they look like this and they have this society and Wow, this is so exciting. How do you know if it's not just imagination? Or how do know you're accidentally reading someone else's mind? Maybe there's a sci-fi author in the next apartment over and you're reading his mind because he's thinking about some other galaxy. So you need feedback. You need good feedback to compare your notes to. And that's basically remote viewing in three minutes.

Timothy Schultz:

And you're seeing this in your mind, in your third eye, or in your, how does this appear to you?

Sean McNamara:

Basically the impressions would come through the same way you receive all your physical senses. So, you know, you could have your eyes closed or open, doesn't matter. But when you imagine something visually, if I tell you to imagine an apple right now, and not everyone can do that. Some people have aphantasia where they can't see visual imagination. But for everybody else, if I say think of an apple and you see an apple in your mind, that's how you would receive a visual perception psychically. But you could also receive sound impressions. And of course, nothing's really coming in through your ears, but if I tell you to remember what the voice of one of your parents sounds like, you could probably remember their voice. And you're not using your ears. You're using your consciousness. Same thing with touch. And I can tell you, hey, remember what warmth feels like on your fingertips. And you can imagine touching the warm sand, and you can almost feel it with your imagination. And so. Psychic impressions come through the same way, and they can include emotions too, or other types of symbolism, or other kinds of spiritual impressions too. All of these can come to you. And it's just about training to be open and to notice these very, very subtle impressions. Part of that is about being able to quiet your mind so that you're not drowning out to psychic impressions with all your normal thoughts or being distracted. Or focusing on some, something's going on in your body that's causing some discomfort. And you're focused on that and you're missing all the very subtle stuff that's coming in. All of this is part of training in remote viewing or other types of clairvoyance, but quieting the mind so that you can hear and feel and see those very subtle impressions coming through from some other space.

Timothy Schultz:

That is so fascinating. And I have a lot of questions about that. But with this Colorado lottery win, how many people were involved in this? And you mentioned the coordinates. So did someone put out coordinates to intentionally try to see this and no one knew what they were looking at? Or how did that work exactly?

Sean McNamara:

So the way we did this was with a team of people I forget each we did this twice. We we've done it several times, but we won twice. And each time we had a team have about 10 or 12 people. Ideally, you'd have one remote viewer per number. So there's 10 numbers. And we have to determine, like, for the number zero, will it be drawn? Or will it not be drawn Wednesday night? And then the number one, will the number be drawn or not be drawn? And we have to do this for all 10 numbers. Now we know why it's harder to do this with a large lottery where there's maybe 62 numbers. Let's say for the Powerball. I forget, it's 61 or 62 numbers? Ideally, you'd have at least 61 or 63 remote viewers. And each one would be randomly assigned one of those numbers to see if it's drawn or not drawn. And the trickiest part is all 60 or 62 of those remote viewers would have to be right. The same time. So the more numbers you're trying to predict at the same time the more complex it is and the higher demand for accuracy. I don't know 60 remote viewers who would all be correct at the same time for the same experiment. But with a Pick 3, just 10 numbers, luckily I have 10 or a dozen friends to help me out with this. But we're not trying to see the numbers, that's not what they were trying to see. So I was the tasker here. And I gave each of the remote viewers the coordinates, and the coordinate was assigned to not one potential target, but to two. So let's say the number zero. I decided if the number 0 will be drawn on Wednesday night, I will show the remote viewer in the future. I will show them, let's say, a picture of an airport if it's drawn. But if the numbers is not drawn on a Wednesday night, I'm going to show them a picture of a scene from the zoo, let's say the Denver Zoo. So I will be showing them their feedback after I know if the number zero is drawn or not. So that means today, when I give them this coordinate, they're focusing on a target that isn't determined yet. It will be determined in the future. And so they start to receive these impressions of the picture that they'll be shown on Wednesday night after the numbers are drawn. And as the tasker then, I look at her transcript and I compare it to the picture of the zoo or the picture of the airport. And if their notes look like the airport, that means that the number zero will be drawn. But if their notes look like a picture of the zoo, then I know that's telling me that the number zero will not be drawn. So in a way, we're like breaking the rules of time. With this technique, I'm having the person, the viewer use their clairvoyance to look into the future. And again, they're not supposed to tell me if the number of zero will be drawn or not. They have no idea what number has been assigned for them. All they know is I'm gonna, as the viewer, I will be showing a picture on Wednesday night and I will send my mind through time to go look at that picture now. So that's how we create the prediction. So for the person dedicated to number zero, their sketches look like the airport. So number zero will be drawn. Then I go to the person who gave me notes for the number 1. Oh, their drawings look like this target that represents that the number will not be drawn, so that's our prediction, that the number one. And hopefully, only three of the numbers are predicted to be drawn because it's the Pick 3. And that seven numbers will be predicted to not be drawn. And in a perfectly clean experiment with associative remote viewing, that's what we would have. We'd have three predictions of numbers being drawn and seven not being drawn. And I don't remember the details, but they are in the book, Signal and Noise, with all the photos of the targets and everyone's transcripts. All the photos are in there. We were not that perfectly accurate. But the benefit of the Pick 3 is, if there was a question, like maybe we predicted four numbers that were gonna be drawn. Well, we could afford to buy a combination of tickets. And then hopefully the right three numbers on one of those tickets would be right. And that turned out to be the case both times. So it wasn't, the prediction was not exact. So we had to buy multiple combinations of the most likely numbers. And then that's how we got the winning ticket. And it's tough because sometimes their transcripts were great, a really strong match for one of the images they'd be shown in the future. But it turns out that they were shown the other image because what really happened was different from what was predicted. So maybe we predicted the number zero would be drawn But in fact, it was not drawn. So I had to show them the other target image. But why did their mind show me the other image instead? That's the tricky part and there are different explanations for that. Maybe the other image was more interesting to their subconscious mind. Maybe they liked the photo of the airport more than the photo the zoo, because that's how powerful the consciousness is. That the consciousness only goes into the picture that they're shown in the future. The consciousness we find out is so powerful, it knows both possible images. It's like it can see potential futures and it'll bring back information from one or both of them. It's a naughty little person who's like not playing by the rules. I just want you to show me the right photo that you'll be shown and sometimes it'll bring back information for the alternate target. So it has to be strengthened, right? It has to trained and what we did the second time we won the Pick 3 was I wanted to experiment with boosting, let's say boosting the signal from the future of the mind sending back information from the future. And what I had people do was when they were there in the future and I was showing them the picture that reflected if a number was drawn or not drawn, I had them dunk their arms in buckets of ice cold water to cause pain. This is a method to use in psychology experiments because it doesn't damage the person permanently. It just causes some discomfort but it doesn' actually hurt them. There's no ethical violation here. The idea was that in the future, so that Wednesday night or Thursday morning, whenever they saw it, and actually it was probably Saturday because we were all together in person. I'm gonna hand them the envelope with a picture that matches what actually happened. Is the number zero drawn? Yes. So here's the picture assigned to that. And as they're looking at it, they're dunking their arm in the ice cold water to cause pain, somehow to intensify the experience. Hoping that now that they see the actual picture, they're sending the information back in time to when they first started their remote viewing session. So it's a two-way street across time. Not only when they're remote viewing, trying to perceive information, are they looking into the future. But later on when they are actually showing their feedback, they're send the information to themselves in the past. It's like telepathy between two people, except they're both the same person, the person in the past and the person in the future. And I often tell people, this might be what it is to be a very lucky person. And especially you, and people you've interviewed on your show, some people say are very lucky people. And maybe they're lucky in other ways besides winning the lottery. But what if a very luck person, what they're doing is, when they're trying to make a decision, and they tend to make the right decision in life on a daily basis, what if their future self is sending back information saying go left. Yeah, go on that date. This is gonna be a good person. Or don't buy that house. That would be a mistake. They're sending information back to themselves. So when they need to make a decision, they're looking ahead in the future, talking to their future self. So yeah, I'm gonna go left, don't go right. Buy this, don't buy that. Say yes to this contract, say no to that. And these people tend to be a little more successful than everybody else. And what if... It's because they have access to their future selves. What if, when some people have won the lottery and they've picked the right numbers, they're receiving that information from their future self, who's the winner? I'm going to stop there and see what questions come out of that.

Timothy Schultz:

Oh, well, so many questions. I mean, that brings up the question of time, obviously. What exactly is time, if it's possible to, because I know there's scientific studies out there, too, about our consciousness extending beyond to know things before they happen. So in my own experience, I just want to get your take on this in addition to what exactly is time. I wanna get your take on my own experience of winning because I had this very vivid dream about 3 months before I won where it felt as if I went out of my body and I experienced that I had already won. And so it was so real to me that it had already happened that it took a while to understand that it hadn't happened. And I'd had other dreams on other subjects other than the lottery or in addition to, before that dream, and that's, so I'd had that type of experience, just not about the lottery, and I believed after that happened that it was going to happen, and then it did. So it was very surreal when it did. But do you think that could have been what happened, or?

Sean McNamara:

th,: 2025

Timothy Schultz:

And would that be like, with our future self, what people refer to as the higher self, or? Right. I hate to use the word God, but you know, this greater consciousness that we're, that some people believe we're all a part of?

Sean McNamara:

Not yet. It's still just an ordinary you, like you are right now, there's a regular you somewhere in the future in this block universe. So they're still not at that level of higher self. However, in terms of higher soul for God or universal consciousness, there's got to be something that's holding it all together. What allows that communication to flow through. It's not something physical, right? It's some other type of information transfer. There's something bigger than us that we're part of that's allowing for this transfer of information. We could call it a medium of some type, like electricity can flow through water as a medium, it can flow though metal as a medium, gold is a really great way for electricity to travel. What is it that allows the signal to travel from you from 3 months ago to you when you're holding the winning lottery ticket? What's the medium there? And maybe that is the higher self, Maybe that's God, maybe that's consciousness. On a very big scale. I think our human brain might be the most sophisticated computer, at least in our solar system. But it's still limited. I think there are concepts out there. I think they're dimensions. I think there are experiences it cannot conceive of because of our physical limitations that the brain has. I think that there's so much to reality that's beyond what the human, what the brain can actually perceive. And that's the realm for where God or consciousness or higher self does its magic. I could be wrong, but that's just what lets me sleep at night.

Timothy Schultz:

It is so, it is so interesting and again, we are here with Sean McNamara He is the author of Signal and Noise: Advanced Psychic Training for Remote Viewing, Clairvoyance and ESP. We will put a link to his book and his website in the show notes if you're listening to this today or in the details below this video if you are watching this on YouTube, but Sean I want to get back to this real quick, but with your Pick 3 win, backing up just a little bit, just to clarify, were people shown the airport or the zoo? Because it sounds like they were not. They just came up with this, or were they, did they have to choose between the two, or were they just shown this? And then how much exactly, do you know roughly how much was won?

Sean McNamara:

Oh, it was probably just 80 bucks, right? It's a very small lottery, yeah. Okay. So, nobody was doing it for the money, for sure. It was for the fun, and because a great reason to use small lotteries for training is because they're perfect random number generators that you can't really guess. You know, a random number generator is used to decide what the winning numbers are, right. You can't be cheated. So the remote viewers at the start of the experiment were not, they had no idea what their target images were. And I just used airport and zoo just for our conversation today. Each one of them had their own set of target photos assigned to them that I chose, but they had no idea what those photographs were of. All they had was a random set of six digits to focus on. So whatever target that it was related to, the target that they would be shown in the future after the numbers were drawn, that's when they would see the target. But until then, they just had these numbers and then they wrote down whatever impressions came to them. So they weren't guessing. They weren't like, mm, I think it's gonna be the airport. I don't think it was gonna be, they had no idea what it would be. And the reason I used a different set of potential target images for each remote viewer is because what happens often in group experiments is, the viewers read each other's minds. So if half the viewers are picking up the airport, the other half might just, instead of seeing their designated target in the future, their mind might just go and start reading their friend's minds and they might start seeing airport too. That's how squiggly consciousness can be with these psychic experiments. The other problem is those viewers, their minds could also just be reading my mind because I've seen all the target photos. And instead of going to the future to see the picture that they'll be shown in the future, it might just go, I'm just gonna go into Sean's consciousness and see what images he's got up there. And I'll write down, and they're not doing this on purpose, right? They're not doin' this consciously as remote viewers. It's their deeper mind that's going around and getting information any which way it can. Cause it's sneaky that way. So it's difficult. This was not an ideal associative remote viewing experiment, because ideally, I'd have someone else picking the potential targets. And someone else would be assigning the coordinates to each remote viewer. And someone else would be deciding, oh, if the number zero is drawn, I'll be shown, they'll be showing the airport. If it's not drawn, they will be showing to the zoo. Someone else should decide which picture they're shown for each outcome. So that everybody involved in planning the experiment only has a little bit of information. In this case, I had all the information. I chose all the targets, I assigned the coordinates, I chose the coordinates of my own random number generator. I had too much information, so all the viewers could just read my mind, even without knowing it, they would be reading my mind. And that might be why we had some misses, and why we still have misses sometimes. But luckily, in those two cases, we had enough strong data to buy several combinations of tickets to win twice. You know, it's a fun training exercise, and it feels so great when we win. It felt so great. But we also feel great when we lose too, because even if we don't get a winning ticket, some people in the group have beautiful transcripts where they really, they did accurately see the image they'd be shown in the future, and their transcript is a really close match for it. Showing, yeah, okay, as a group, we didn't get the right winning numbers, but several people in the group had exceptional clairvoyance during the experiment, and that's beautiful to see. So the $80 jackpot, it's not very exciting, but when someone has a great transcript, they did a great job seeing the future. That's exciting, and that is priceless.

Timothy Schultz:

Extraordinary. It's so fascinating. I'm curious, theoretically, what is your opinion on, because you mentioned the Powerball, the Mega Millions, some people watching this might play Euro Millions in Europe from all over the world, but with these big games that have 60 something plus numbers and then maybe one other ball, you mentioned that it wouldn't be so practical to have 60-something remote viewers doing this. So theoretically, if you had, I just want to get your opinion, five people or one person or a small number of people that are very excellent, like they get it right just about every time with something like this. What do you think? Could that happen? I'm trying to devise a new strategy to win again.

Sean McNamara:

I mean I think it's possible, I don't think anything is impossible. And there are ways to construct the experiment. So let's say there's a lottery out there with 60 numbers. And what if we had 10 remote viewers and each one of them was responsible for 6 numbers. And each number was assigned a target image. And every target image has to be distinct from the others. And their job is to see the image. So let's say someone's responsible for number zero through five, so the first six numbers. And the number zero is assigned the airport. The number one is assigned to the zoo. The number three is assigned a picture of the flat irons in Boulder, and so on and so forth. And then we have the remote viewer, we give them a coordinate. And the coordinate represents. Which of the photos will be shown after we know what the winning lottery numbers are. And actually, they need a seventh target, and that seventh target represents that none of those six numbers are drawn. Okay, so each one has seven potential targets. And let's say, let's see this person starts drawing, oh my gosh, I'm seeing, I'm getting something about rocks, mountains, but they're all at an angle. But I'm getting a small city feel too. Oh, clearly they're picking up the Boulder flat irons, which I think we decided was represented the number two being drawn. So that we would, part of our prediction would be, okay, because of this remote viewer, we're putting down number two as one of the winning numbers. And so we need 10 remote viewers who are excellent and they would all have to correctly see the target that be shown in the future and have a great transcript. A very clear transcript and then we'd know which six numbers would be drawn if the universe would like to allow at that time and produce that meaning. Because even if your transcripts are excellent and there's no question which target image they're seeing in the future, I think the majority thought in the remote viewing community is that the future is probabilistic, meaning they'll probably get the right numbers, but it's not guaranteed. And that's why I came up with that idea of the jello for the block universe, because jello wiggles. And for highly volatile events like lottery numbers or dice or if the wind in my backyard is going to blow left or right, you know, very volatile things. Even though right now the prediction looks so good that the number 2 will be drawn just like that, the jello could wiggle in the universe and it changes, even though we had a great prediction. Do this twice correctly and if we had a team of eight solid experienced, well-trained and confident remote viewers and they're all right at the same, in the same experiment yeah that's possible. They're professional remote viewers right now making people a lot of money in the stock market using this technique. And there are, so there's a group out there, a great group that I trained with for a while, and it's a public group. You can attend their conferences now, I think that's mostly on Zoom, called the Applied Precognition Project, led by Marty Rosenblatt. Great group of people. It's a great place to learn associative remote viewing. But back then, we'd go to Las Vegas together and use associative remote viewing and remote viewing to find out, you know, bet on the ponies, horse racing, and even things like roulette. So there are ways you can try and predict is red or black gonna win the next time you win the next time you play roulette? And you can use remote viewing for this. So the way it's probably the most effective is when one of the outcomes is already sort of certain. So if you if you're trying to predict a football game, who's going to win if one of teams is already pretty certain to win because they're just that much better and if the prediction looks like they're going to win, It's sort of predicting what we'd guess was gonna happen. Then there's less volatility. The probability is still pretty strong that they're gonna win, and you're just sort of confirming the possible win through remote viewing. So that's probably where you're gonna have your highest degree of success is with sporting games like that, where the outcome is already kind of leading in one direction.

Timothy Schultz:

When it's not so random with things, it brings up the question of what exactly is luck? You know, do you believe that it's tied to energy and awareness? And I mean, are things meant to happen before they happen? And we, you've kind of touched on this, but...

Sean McNamara:

I think one part of it for sure is if someone is open and sensitive to listening to their gut. Then that can increase their luck for sure like some people, Even though they're at the intersection and the light turned green, but something told them don't start driving forward because if they had, that truck would have run through the intersection and smacked them right. Is that luck or did they listen to their gut because somehow, Some part of their mind, their consciousness saw forward in time by about 1 1/2 seconds and said don't step on the gas. So with that kind of decision making, Luck could be, you just randomly chose the right way to go, or you're listening to those very subtle impressions that are coming. Like the people at the Institute of Noetic Science, I think they've done this experiment. If not, other people have, maybe at the Rhine Research Center. Both of those that I just mentioned do a lot of psychic research. And one of them, I think, has done this experiment where they wire up someone to watch a monitor and to see how they respond. Before they're shown a scene on the monitor. And sometimes there's nothing shows up and you can tell that they're not responding. And in some cases they're shown a very violent scene or a sexual scene, but what they see because they're wired up, their brain actually responded to the image milliseconds before they actually saw the image. It's like some part of their mind is already operating in the future and it can tell what's coming and their bodies responding. So a very lucky person, I bet, is already very sensitive to the subtle feelings in the body that tell it to. Go for it or stop.

Timothy Schultz:

For people that are watching or listening today that want to become more intuitive or they want to start remote viewing or they wanna create or manifest the life that they want or really enhance their consciousness and sensitivity to this stuff, where do you even begin?

Sean McNamara:

A couple easy ways, or a couple easy answers are, one is my book, Signal and Noise, it is a training book. And if they get the book, don't flip through it, just start at page one, because there's feedback in the book that you wanna see it after you've done your viewing. So it'll show you how to do remote viewing. I also have an online course that's based on lottery drawings, so people could use that course. But a better answer is, I would recommend people start meditating. And I have free... meditation courses on my website. Just go to the meditation page. There'll be a couple different options free guided meditation where you sit quietly for 45 minutes and Learn to quiet the mind and relax the body. So that it becomes like a still pond and then when the psychic impression comes, It's like dropping a stone in the water and the ripples go out in the water and you perceive them because finally you're quiet enough. So I think doing contemplative practices like meditation are very helpful for getting started in any kind of psychic perception, even dream work. People who meditate are more successful at things like lucid dreaming. They're just more alert, they're attentive. So if anyone wants to get better at remembering their dreams or having lucid dreams, just meditate every day. And it doesn't have to be for 45 minutes, but at least 20 minutes. At least training yourself to have the experience of going from a regular noisy mind, like you just got off work and everything's like, ah, to just watching the thoughts settle. Like a glass of dirty water, the dirt settles on the bottom, leaving clear water. That's what meditation can do. And it's in the clarity where the psychic impressions are most visible.

In the in the silence, silence you're not listening to any sort of soundtrack because there's all these soundtracks out there.

No, I prefer unconditioned meditation, that's what I call it, where you're not listening to nice music that makes you feel good, you're just relaxing, you are not spacing out, you are actually sitting in silence, and it's a discipline, it's skill to work with the movement of the mind. It's like you're sitting across a coffee shop from a friend and it is a very loud coffee shop. Can you focus the mind to silence the noise so that you can hear a friend whispering across the room? That's a different kind of meditation versus I'm gonna listen to binaural beats or to a new age music. I mean, it's a lovely experience. Stress reduction is really important. So if people meditate with music and it reduces their stress, highly valuable. But for psychic perception and spiritual work, meditating in silence and working, working at... finding the silence and resting in it, which really isn't about working, it's about allowing and relaxing, and things become silent on their own, and not getting attached to the thoughts that come and go. So a different skill set than just sitting there listening to nice music, that everything has its value in the right context.

Timothy Schultz:

And would you say that we're like human antennas, so to speak? I mean, where is this information can be coming from our future selves? Are we, we can pick up information from anything?

Sean McNamara:

And we probably pick up information without even knowing it all the time by the people we're surrounded by, by the environment, by what's happening across the world. There is an experiment that's been running for years now called the Global Consciousness Project. And they have these little machines, these random number generators, all over the globe. And so when they're working appropriately, they're just shooting out random numbers. But what they found out is when there's a major worldwide event, let's say like 9-11, everybody on the planet, or most people on the planet knew what was happening at least hours after the event. Everybody was shocked, sad, angry, strong emotions and thoughts around the world at the same time. And these random number generators around the world all became non-random. They picked up on what's happening in consciousness globally. What does that mean? It means that my consciousness isn't just affecting me. It's affecting other people, it's affecting the environment, it is affecting society. So people can just Google global consciousness project to learn about that experiment and I think it's still running and there are other great examples of how it picked up on the world's perception of an event. But what is it in us that where do we receive the information? I know there's a lot of talk about the third eye and the pineal gland. I look once in a while, I don't think there's any definitive scientific study saying that that's where psychic information flows. It could be the whole brain. Some people have the theory or the hypothesis that our DNA is the antenna If we look at yogic traditions like Hatha yoga or Himalayan tantric Buddhist traditions There's a lot of yoga involving energy moving up the spine and into the brain. Maybe the whole system of the nervous system is the antenna. But then we have the enteric nervous system, the nervous system in the gut that moves a lot of information there below consciousness. The heart has neurons on it too. The heart, it has its own brain, it has its own knowledge. And of course, our fingertips are one of the most sensitive parts of our body. Our whole body is so sensitive. So is it any one piece? That's, that's where the information enters. I don't know. I'm inclined to think it's a it's, it's a system. It's a system. But that's as far as I know because I'm not a biologist. I'm not a doctor. I'me not a physicist. So I can only hypothesize. But what I do know is when I'm in a good state of mind, when I am not overwhelmed by stress and anxiety, my perception is more accurate. And I'm not a super psychic or anything like that. I'm, I'd say I'm an average psychic. Everybody's psychic to one degree or another. It's universal, and studies have been done, scientific studies, to reveal everybody's psychic to one degree or the other. I'm just, I'm a pretty good teacher of these abilities, but I'm not super psychic at all. And that's okay with me. I realize the greatest gift of being alive is to be a human being. And just to be a regular person, to be young, grow old, encounter the possibility of mortality, that's what makes things meaningful, to experience love and growth and discovery. That's great. So I'm no longer concerned with being psychic, but I love teaching it, because I love to see the wonder on people's faces and see that they're more than what they used to think that they are, that the world is much bigger than that.

Timothy Schultz:

I love this so much and Sean McNamara, the author of Signal and Noise: Advanced Psychic Training for Remote Viewing, Clairvoyance and ESP and you have to check out his website. He has workshops as he mentioned and is also teaching people about these types of techniques and stuff. But Sean, where can people find out more about you and find your book? Mindpossible.com Excellent. And we will put a link to that in the show notes if you're listening to this or in the description if you are watching this on YouTube. But Sean, I have questions that could go on for hours, but I absolutely respect your time. So is there anything else that you want to say today that I didn't ask or that you just, or that I don't know enough to ask or that just wanted to say?

Sean McNamara:

I think for people out there, if they know people like you who've had the experience you've had with the lottery, you know, there's something about hanging out with people like you. Hanging out with the people who've had the experience, it's like it can kind of rub off a little bit. At least the idea opens people's minds that there's more to life than we think there is. So I just want to suggest to your viewers, like, hang out with Tim, keep watching his videos. Hang out with the people he interviews. There's something that's shared that's below the surface just by spending time and listening to people like like Tim. So yeah, I just want to encourage people to keep doing what they're doing listening to you

Timothy Schultz:

ongratulations, again, on the: 2019

Sean McNamara:

Thanks so much, I appreciate talking to you.